In this series of events, we will read and discuss scholarly articles documenting and evaluating the use of virtual reality, augmented reality, and related technologies grouped under the general category of “extended reality.” These events will take place via Zoom and begin with a brief interview with one or more article authors. They will be followed by additional discussion within the main Zoom room or breakout rooms, with a final share-out session if the group is large.
Monday, March 31
12 pm – 1 pm (EST)
Zoom
Our second spring 2025 session will discuss an article by Anderson and colleagues (2021), demonstrating how a nursing program evaluated an augmented reality (AR) system for nurse practitioner students, with measures of both the AR system itself and the pedagogical techniques with which it was implemented. The study found the pedagogical techniques sound, and the technology stimulating, but there were mixed results with the specific AR system deployed. This article could be of interest to faculty considering how to deploy and test extended reality (virtual and augmented reality) systems in their classes. Three of the authors will join us for the conversation: Dr. Mindi Anderson, Dr. Desiree Diaz, and Dr. Frank Guido-Sanz, all with the University of Central Florida.
Register for March Session
*Please register at least 24 hours before the event.
Article Link:
Article Abstract:
Background: Before implementation, simulations and new technologies should be piloted for usability and effectiveness. Simulationists and augmented reality (AR) researchers developed an augmented reality (AR) triage scenario for Nurse Practitioner (NP) students. Methods: A mixed-method, exploratory, pilot study was carried out with NP students and other volunteers. Participants completed several tools to appraise the usability of the AR modality and the effectiveness of the scenario for learning. Open-ended questions were asked, and qualitative themes were obtained via content analysis. Results: Mixed results were received by the twelve participants (8 students, 4 other volunteers). There were some issues with usability, and technical challenges occurred. The debriefing was found to be effective, and favorable comments were made on simulation realism. Further preparation for the content and technology, along with more practice, was inferred. Those with reported previous AR experience found the experience more effective. Conclusions: Further improvements are needed with usability of the AR modality. Debriefing can be effective and the simulation realistic. Participants need further preparation in triaging and use of the technology, and more practice is needed. AR simulations have promise for use in NP education.
